Mathematical Physics

   

Einstein’s Energy Is Connected To A New Dark Energy In A Rotational Double Torus Universe While Accelerated Space-expansion in Big Bang Cosmology Is An Optical Illusion.

Authors: Dan Visser

Einstein’s energy is connected to a new dark energy force, refined-time, the fundamental constants of Planck and Newton and prove the universe is a rotational Double Torus Universe. Also is proven that an accelerated space-expansion in a stand-alone Big Bang cosmology is an optical illusion. This paper presents a new energy-equation connecting Einstein’s relativistic-energy to a new dark matter-force in a new dark energy force. This new equation is the result of combining a rather new energy-formula of E. Verlinde (UvA-NL) with my new dark energy force-formula of my Double Torus hypothesis. The Double Torus hypothesis is a new model for the universe and against Big Bang Cosmology. A second new equation proves indeed the accelerated space-time expansion is an optical illusion. The new dark energy force uses refined time, which is smaller than the Planck-time. Such causes a cyclic refined time-process from a sub-quantum scale recalculating dark matter towards the quantum scale, but in a rotational Double Torus Universe. This has consequences for the philosophy of past and future.

Comments: 13 Pages. I hope the press will take notice of the Double Torus hypothesis and in particular this paper.

Download: PDF

Submission history

[v1] 2013-11-17 06:39:16

Unique-IP document downloads: 55 times

Vixra.org is a pre-print repository rather than a journal. Articles hosted may not yet have been verified by peer-review and should be treated as preliminary. In particular, anything that appears to include financial or legal advice or proposed medical treatments should be treated with due caution. Vixra.org will not be responsible for any consequences of actions that result from any form of use of any documents on this website.

Add your own feedback and questions here:
You are equally welcome to be positive or negative about any paper but please be polite. If you are being critical you must mention at least one specific error, otherwise your comment will be deleted as unhelpful.

comments powered by Disqus