Authors: Dan visser
In particular calculations have been made for the detection of extraterrestrial high energy neutrinos. Additional the rest-energy of a neutrino is calculated (equivalent to its rest mass). But both calculations are not standard. The calculations are made from the perspective of a new model for the universe: The Double Torus hypothesis. The alternative calculation shows that the result matches a neutrino-incident in the ICECUBE-project in Antartica for a value of 250 TeV energy. Moreover, an extra calculation is made for the expected neutrino rest-energy by the Standard Model (equivalent for its rest-mass). This shows time 21 times smaller than the Planck-time can generate a neutrino-rest-energy of 2.2 eV. It also shows time 100 times smaller than the Planck-time can generate a neutrino-rest-energy of 0.1 eV. This delivers evidence for the existence of a sub-quantum-domain of refined time that affects dark vacuum-particles; this is dark matter described in the Double Torus-framework. That generates visible quantum-gravitational particles. Such a calculation could also be performed for an electron or a quark. But that is not (yet) performed in this paper. But one of the conclusions is that the detection of high energy neutrinos could turn out to be additional evidence for the existence of rotational Double Torus Universe.
Comments: 5 Pages. I hope the press takes notice. The result violates GRT. Signed: Dan Visser, Almere, the Netherlands
Download: PDF
[v1] 2013-11-28 10:08:45
[v2] 2013-12-15 09:13:30
Unique-IP document downloads: 120 times
Vixra.org is a pre-print repository rather than a journal. Articles hosted may not yet have been verified by peer-review and should be treated as preliminary. In particular, anything that appears to include financial or legal advice or proposed medical treatments should be treated with due caution. Vixra.org will not be responsible for any consequences of actions that result from any form of use of any documents on this website.
Add your own feedback and questions here:
You are equally welcome to be positive or negative about any paper but please be polite. If you are being critical you must mention at least one specific error, otherwise your comment will be deleted as unhelpful.