Relativity and Cosmology

   

Comparative Equivalence

Authors: Paris S. Miles-Brenden

There exist scales in the descriptions of both quantum mechanics and general relativity. For instance there is the quantity hbar in quantum mechanics and the quantity c in special and general relativity. The general invariance of these quantities is important to the given theories, as it sets a scale for physics. It is hypothesized that general relativity and quantum mechanics possess mutually independent, covariant representations with these quantities setting scales of evolution. In spaces of constant curvature, particles in inertial freefall either separate or come together as an aspect of these scales and the given energy momentum in quantum mechanics and general relativity. This topic is discussed in the context of inertial eigenstates for a system with a background spin field. This results in a generally covariant like behavior of the electromagnetic interaction, which has properties analogous to a gravitational system. The implication of this is the appearance of a gap to excitations and other features strongly related to superconductivity, as well as features appropriate to the treatment of separation of two hydrogen atoms in space and time. It is shown that a flat apparently expanding space is a consequence of these contributions, and that an energy momentum gap is predicted from this theory.

Comments: 27 Pages. Rough finalized draft of paper.

Download: PDF

Submission history

[v1] 2014-10-14 16:22:37

Unique-IP document downloads: 40 times

Vixra.org is a pre-print repository rather than a journal. Articles hosted may not yet have been verified by peer-review and should be treated as preliminary. In particular, anything that appears to include financial or legal advice or proposed medical treatments should be treated with due caution. Vixra.org will not be responsible for any consequences of actions that result from any form of use of any documents on this website.

Add your own feedback and questions here:
You are equally welcome to be positive or negative about any paper but please be polite. If you are being critical you must mention at least one specific error, otherwise your comment will be deleted as unhelpful.

comments powered by Disqus