Authors: Yi Cao
Using the same method developed in paper SunQM-3s6, the (close to the true) mass density r-distribution for gas/ice planets has been estimated based on {N,n} QM probability distribution. Based on this calculation (as well as on other scientists’ calculation), the center core mass density for Jupiter, Saturn, Uranus, Neptune, and the undiscovered {3,2} planet (if it does formed) are estimated to be: ~ 26000 kg/m^3, ~ 23000 kg/m^3, ~ 16500 kg/m^3, ~ 17000 kg/m^3, and ~ 16000 kg/m^3 respectively. Although a celestial body’s formation is primarily based on G-force, after passing a critical mass point (estimated between 1E+19 kg to 7E+22 kg), the {N,n} QM-force starts to affect the internal structure of this celestial body. For an in situ formed (large) celestial body, its {N,n} QM governed radial structure is always coupled with its gravity governed radial structure, although they may be de-coupled under certain situation. If we define the pFactor's quantum number as “q”, then a p{N,n//q} QM state can be written as |qnlm>. The analysis suggests that q is also a superpositioned quantum number in |qnlm> QM state. The analysis reveals that Jupiter’s current QM structure p{N,n//5} may not be at a Jupiter-massed celestial body’s “global energy minimum” state. In other words, among all possible superpositional q(s), q=5 may not be the ground state for a Jupiter-massed celestial body’s |qnlm> state. The analysis also suggests that q=6 is a Sun-massed celestial body’s “global energy minimum” state, so Solar system’s {N,n//6} QM structure is a |qnlm> ground state for the quantum number q.
Comments: 18 Pages.
Download: PDF
[v1] 2018-12-17 13:57:38
[v2] 2019-03-08 23:04:26
Unique-IP document downloads: 123 times
Vixra.org is a pre-print repository rather than a journal. Articles hosted may not yet have been verified by peer-review and should be treated as preliminary. In particular, anything that appears to include financial or legal advice or proposed medical treatments should be treated with due caution. Vixra.org will not be responsible for any consequences of actions that result from any form of use of any documents on this website.
Add your own feedback and questions here:
You are equally welcome to be positive or negative about any paper but please be polite. If you are being critical you must mention at least one specific error, otherwise your comment will be deleted as unhelpful.