[6] viXra:1008.0092 [pdf] replaced on 2013-11-25 08:47:03
Authors: Nainan K. Varghese
Comments: 9 Pages. Originally published in General Science Journal
Abstract: This article attempts to give a simple and logical explanation to tidal mechanism, based on a radically different dynamics, presented in book ‘MATTER Re-examined)’ [1]. Tides are caused by (accelerating) actions of external efforts on a linearly moving spinning-macro body. Each external effort alters shape of spinning macro body, separately, to produce its own set of tides. Change in shape of a spinning macro body, rather than displacement of its parts, cause tides. Displacement of ocean water in the direction of moving tide is superficial and it cannot produce tidal drag on earth’s solid core body.
Category: Astrophysics
[5] viXra:1008.0076 [pdf] replaced on 30 Aug 2010
Authors: V. Christianto
Comments: 7 Pages
In this note, we describe shortly time varying Sun-Earth distance in the light of Carmeli
metric and compare the result with recent astrometric data. The graphical plot suggests
that there should be linear-linear correspondence between Sun-planets distances and their
time variation.
Category: Astrophysics
[4] viXra:1008.0074 [pdf] submitted on 26 Aug 2010
Authors: Lyndon Ashmore
Comments: 7 Pages
A review of the literature on the Lyman alpha forest gives direct evidence on the dynamics of the
universe. In an expanding universe one would expect the average temperature of the universe to fall
as it expands - but a review of the Doppler parameters of the Hydrogen clouds in Quasar spectra
shows that contrary to this, they are increasing in temperature (or at least, becoming increasingly
disturbed) as the universe ages. Addition-ally, in an expanding universe, hydrogen clouds must become
further apart with time, so, as redshift increases, the clouds would be closer together. Instead,
the evidence is that, on average, they are evenly spaced up to a redshift of one - if not beyond.
How can this be so if the universe is expanding? Especially since this range of redshifts includes
the supernovae data used to show 'acceleration' and so called 'time dilation.' Taking these results
in isolation implies that the universe has been static for at least the last billion years or so
and therefore a new model of redshift is needed to explain redshifts in a static universe.
The model proposed here is that in a static universe, photons of light from distant galaxies are
absorbed and reemitted by electrons in the plasma of intergalactic space and on each interaction
the electron recoils. Energy is lost to the recoiling electron (New Tired Light theory) and thus
the reemitted photon has less energy, a reduced frequency and therefore an increased wavelength.
It has been redshifted. The Hubble relationship be-comes 'photons of light from a galaxy twice as
far away, make twice as many interactions with the electrons in the plasma of IG space, lose twice
as much energy and undergo twice the redshift.' A relationship between redshift and distance is
found and, using published values of collision cross-sections and number density of electrons in
IG space, a value for the Hubble constant is derived which is in good agreement with measured
values. Assuming that the energy transferred to the recoiling electron is emitted as secondary
radiation; the wavelength is calculated and found to be consistent with the wavelengths of the CMB.
On the basis that plasma clouds result in periodicity or 'quantised' galaxy redshifts it is shown
that the average spacing between hydrogen clouds (z = 0.026) compares favourably with an average
spacing between galaxy clusters (z = 0.023). A test of this theory in the laboratory is proposed
whereby a high powered laser could be fired through sparse cold plasma and the theories predicted
increase in emission of microwave radiation of a particular frequency determined.
Category: Astrophysics
[3] viXra:1008.0073 [pdf] submitted on 26 Aug 2010
Authors: Lyndon Ashmore
Comments: 8 Pages
The Hubble diagram for type Ia Supernovae gives the value of the Hubble constant, H as 64±3 km/s Mpc-1 which,
in SI units, is equal to 'hre/me per unit volume of space'
(2.1x10-18 s-1). This coincidence could suggest a
relationship between H and the electrons in the plasma of intergalactic space that act collectively and
oscillate if displaced. The possibility that light from distant galaxies is absorbed and reemitted by the
electrons is considered with the electron recoiling on both occasions. A double Mössbauer effect leads to a
redshift in the transmitted light. Introduction of the photoabsorption cross section 2reλ leads to the
relationship H = 2nehre/me giving H = 12 km/s Mpc-1 when ne has
the reported value of
ne ~ 10-7cm-3. The small
amount of energy transferred to the electron by recoil is radiated as bremstrahlung with a wavelength in the
microwave region.
Category: Astrophysics
[2] viXra:1008.0029 [pdf] replaced on 2021-11-21 09:05:24
Authors: Nainan Varghese
Comments: 12 Pages.
A part of action by ‘central force’ between planetary and central bodies causes their spin motions. All macro bodies in planetary systems develop mean accelerating spin motion. Depending on their orbital parameters, planets and central bodies may spin forward, rearward or, in rare cases, may have no spin motion at all. All macro bodies in a planetary system tend to spin in common orbital plane. Angular accelerations of orbiting macro bodies continue indefinitely until centrifugal actions disintegrate planets and planetary system. In an orbiting macro body, consistency of its matter-content and radial size determines relative spin speeds at different parts. Equatorial region of all very large orbiting macro bodies spin faster than their polar regions or regions towards their spin-axes. Lengthening of (terrestrial) solar days, presently misinterpreted as slowing down of earth’s spin motion, is the result of insufficient compensation to earth’s apparent spin motion about sun.
Category: Astrophysics
[1] viXra:1008.0010 [pdf] replaced on 2013-11-03 07:16:53
Authors: Nainan K. Varghese
Comments: 19 Pages.
It is an established fact that sun is a moving macro body in space. By simple mechanics, it is physically impossible for a free planetary body to orbit around a moving central body, in any type of geometrically closed path. Both, a circle and an ellipse, are closed geometrical figures. Hence, elliptical planetary orbital paths (closed geometrical figures) around sun are false or apparent. A planetary body moves in same direction and along with its central body. It is only when we imagine reversing the direction of planetary body’s motion, on one side of central body’s path; we can get a geometrically closed figure for planet’s apparent orbital path. Use of a reference frame, related to a static central body, causes planetary orbital paths to appear as closed geometrical figures around central body. As central body is a moving body, this does not reflect physical reality. Although they help to explain apparent phenomena, all properties attributed to elliptical/circular planetary orbital path are unreal. Real physical actions are restricted to real entities and they have to be understood with reference to an absolute reference. Since elliptical shape of a planetary orbit is an imaginary aspect, it has its limitations to explain real actions in nature. Mechanism of orbit-formation and limitations of orbiting macro bodies, described in this article, are based on a radically different dynamics from an alternative concept presented in book, ‘MATTER (Re-examined)’.
Category: Astrophysics