General Science and Philosophy

1507 Submissions

[7] viXra:1507.0217 [pdf] submitted on 2015-07-29 14:46:33

Pragmatical Solving of Uncertainties on Production Flow

Authors: Mirela Teodorescu, Daniela Gifu
Comments: 9 Pages.

Abstract: Achieving a high quality product corresponding consumer requirements involves organizing and supporting the production process with a suitable and flexible logistics process. The more the process/ production flow is better organized, divided into subdomains (production, maintenance, quality), each with clearly defined indicators and responsibilities, the more the process will be stable, easier to follow and to intervene on perturbations that can appear. In a stable system, disturbance variables can be controlled, thus losses can be reduced. Everybody is looking for "the optimal process", "best method" that would remove the uncertainty, ambiguity, defect, doubt and error. This study aims to present ways of correcting the uncertainties arising in production systems through standardization, communication, waste awareness, efficient logistics, states incertitude interpretation, analysis and performance indicators, applying neutrosophy theory, because a product that has several options increases the grade of uncertainty in the manufacturing process.
Category: General Science and Philosophy

[6] viXra:1507.0152 [pdf] submitted on 2015-07-20 04:14:59

In God We Mind or Physical Considerations of Divine

Authors: Dmitri Martila
Comments: 10 Pages.

It is possible to buy this paper, your money will not be spent for entertainment and you will be rewarded in Heaven for spending your time and money to consume and promote (among your contacts and friends) the product of the Cripple author. Points for God they call not the proofs, but the ``arguments''. It is because they are illustrations of divine. As example: God exists, because word ``God'' means ``exists''. He has more right to exist than anyone else. Therefore the criticism against the arguments (main modern arguers: S.Hawking, R.Dawkins) is pointless. Dr. Marcelo Gleiser, in his article ``Hawking And God: An Intimate Relationship'' wrote: ``Maybe Hawking should leave God alone.'' The Universe could have been any. But it is the most complex in face of humans. Probability of such ``random'' event is zero. For sure, without God the complexity would be average, but not the top one.
Category: General Science and Philosophy

[5] viXra:1507.0141 [pdf] submitted on 2015-07-18 07:52:20

Analele Universității Din Craiova. Seria Filosofie, 35(1), 2015.

Authors: Adriana Neacșu
Comments: 207 Pages.

This study deals with the concept of caring for oneself and its relationship with the precept of self-knowledge in the Neoplatonists, as they were approached by Michel Foucault in The Hermeneutics of the Subject and The History of Sexuality volumes II and III. It points out the fact that according to Michel Foucault, the Neoplatonists remain broadly loyal to oneself care concept developed by Plato in his dialogue Alcibiades. In this sense, it highlights both the common elements and those that differentiate the Neoplatonists from Plato. It deals with the causes which developed significant changes in the Neoplatonists’ vision on the care for oneself. It emphasizes the importance of the concept of caring for oneself in Michel Foucault in the context of his interest for the complex relationship between the subject of knowledge and truth. Key words: care for oneself, self-knowledge, self-culture, truth, condition of spirituality, art to live, Plato, the Neoplatonists.
Category: General Science and Philosophy

[4] viXra:1507.0114 [pdf] submitted on 2015-07-15 11:00:10

My Proofs of God

Authors: Dmitri Martila
Comments: 5 Pages.

Some of my proofs of God. Time machine proof, Actual infinity proof, Quantum proof.
Category: General Science and Philosophy

[3] viXra:1507.0085 [pdf] submitted on 2015-07-12 15:55:46

Communicational Nucleus of Philosophical Thinking

Authors: Ștefan Vlăduțescu, Xenia Negrea, Dan Valeriu Voinea
Comments: 19 Pages.

The current research is a meta-analysis that circumscribes to Communication Philosophy. The inquiry is ranged among what is called the dynamics of reshaping the conceptual standard-matrix of Communication. It is aimed to be an explicit answer to a double question: i) what makes a communicational discourse to be „philosophy” and ii) what accurately individualizes the philosophical discourse, making from a text „a philosophical text”, a philosophical discourse, a philosophical message? We formulate an answer founded on two arguments. The first argument is that, as form of thinking, Philosophy presents three “main dimensions” [“language use”, “communication of beliefs (cognition)”, and “interaction in situations” - as a “standard principle” -Van Dijk, 1997)]; these dimensions are the dimensions of any discourse, so Philosophy is a specialized discourse, a philosophical discourse. The second argument is that, as a written language form of communication, Philosophy is a deep communicational cognition. Viewing Philosophy as discourse and as a deep cogitation communication, it follows that: 1. in philosophical communication, as well as in any other type of communicational discourse, the producer is not fundamental, but the nuclear message which he succeeds in transmitting and co-constructing meanings together with his recipient; 2. the discursive approach of philosophemes and „philosophematic” message is the distinctive feature of philosophical communication, of philosophical discourse, of the philosophical text as communication practice.
Category: General Science and Philosophy

[2] viXra:1507.0081 [pdf] replaced on 2015-07-28 12:30:26

Analysis on George Rajna's Paper (viXra:1506.0171)

Authors: Andrew Nassif
Comments: 3 Pages.

George Rajna provides a valuable insight on the commercial interest of Quantum Computing. In this paper I try summarizing what he is trying to say while at the same time providing a literary, yet academic view of his paper in general. I believe the paper provides some profound insights and this is a peer review article I wanted to share with the Vixra community.
Category: General Science and Philosophy

[1] viXra:1507.0068 [pdf] submitted on 2015-07-10 04:50:52

The Formalism of General Systems Theory: 10 Dimensional Superorganisms. Its Application to Human Sciences.

Authors: Luis Sancho
Comments: 32 Pages.

General Systems Theory (GST) describes all physical, biologic and social systems as 10-Dimensional Superorganisms. There are 2 key differences between the 10Di Complex Universe and a 4Di, simplified physical model: -Physics considers 3 spatial dimensions and 1 time dimension of lineal, present duration that calculates the external motion of beings with instantaneous derivatives (V=∂s/∂t), or simultaneous measures (worldlines). Thus 4D tells nothing of system’s life-death and evolutionary cycles from past to future – its 2 missing time dimensions; and their inner, hierarchical structure across 3 ‘i-scalar’ dimensions: the i-1 cellular/quantum, i organic and i+1 social/cosmic scales, which emerge together into Whole Superorganisms, the 10th Dimension, itself an i-1 cellular/atomic unit of a new game of scalar space-time creation. -Physicists' dimensions are infinite, absolute, reaching the Whole Universe, acting as an abstract 'background' over which beings exist. But what those beings are made of? There is no clear answer. Yet in the GST’s 10Di formalism, beings are made of ‘Fractal’ Dimensions, which are not abstract, neither infinite but the ultimate substance of reality, broken into the parts of each being. The Whole Universe is infinite and so are its 10 Dimensions of time, space and ‘scalar’ depth. But Nature’s systems are its ‘fractal parts’, made of the same 10Di, albeit in a finite quantity. So each part occupies a limited quantity of space, lives a limited quantity of time, and spreads through a limited i±1 number of hierarchical scales. Finally, since all the systems of the Universe are made with the same 10 Dimensions, they share the properties of scalar space & time, which is the cause of its isomorphisms. Thus all systems of nature: -Last a life-death worldcycle of 3 past-energetic-young, adult-iterative-present and Informative-future-old time dimensions. -Have 3 diffeomorphic space dimensions, enclosed by bidimensional membranes, through which they communicate (holographic principle); reason why systems display 3 space&time dimensional organs that correspond to the 3-only varieties of 2-manifold topological networks (space geometries with time motions): -Energetic, hyperbolic, long, young-past, fields-limbs, with expansive, entropic, dissolving motions: STe <∑i-1. -Informative, spherical, tall, future, particles-heads with implosive, warped motions: STo >∏i+1. -Reproductive, toroid, wide, adult-present, waves-bodies that combine energy&information into exi Actions:STa=STe x STo. Thus Past-Energy x Future-Information=Present, iterative actions, becomes the metric equation of Scalar Space-Time that puts together those 3 ST-organs, extended across 3 i±1 relative scales, into a Whole 10Di Unit-Universe: U=A(ExO)I±11 10Di ‘metrics’ completes Leibniz’s relational model of scalar space-time, explaining why time clocks in Relativity have different speeds. Since systems’ inner time clocks that carry their in-form-ation in the form and frequency of its worldcycles, accelerate as they shrink in scalar Space. Yet its metric product origin of Universal & Vital Constants, remains co-invariant. Life-death worldcycles are travels through 3i±1 scales, from seminal birth in faster i-1 cellular/atomic scales, till emerging in i-scales where systems live 3 time ages within i+1 social scales till an energetic big-bang death, dissolve Nature’s systems back into the cellular/atomic plane, ending their worldcycles, during which all Systems will try to Maximize their scalar 3 ST-Organs, feeding on Energy, gauging information, reproducing and evolving socially, 4 actions, E, O,⇔, ∑∏i±1 that define all ‘existential functions’ Thus ∑Ei-1<≈i>∏Oi+1, becomes the Fractal, Feed-back, Generator Equation of Reality. Thus 10Di develops a causal logic of 3 time arrows and completes non-Euclidean Geometries of points crossed by ∞ parallels, which are fractal i-1 points that grow into full 10Di systems as we enlarge its scale (1st non-E postulate). Therefore lines are waves with volume (2nd); the degree of equality (3rd) of its 3 parts determines the Darwinian or symbiotic behavior of points, which form social networks when they share the same information, becoming Non-E planes (4th). The paper introduces 10Di superorganisms and its isomorphisms for all species; then it applies 10D GST to social science: -Each human is a relative i-1 citizen/cell of History, its 10Di Whole. Gaia is its STenergetic network; Economics, its STreproductive network; politics its STo-informative network. Thus a perfect World would construct those networks with the laws of 10Di superorganisms. But the Anthropocene=History is only an Age of Earth’s evolution, which now mutates into the Mechanocene - the superorganism of i+1 ‘company-mothers’ of machines, i-organic systems of i-1 metal, which ‘enzymen’ evolved in 3 dimensional Ages: the European age of STenergetic metal-bodies (XIX c.), the American age of STo metal-minds’ (XX c.), assembled now globally into STa=STexSTo autonomous robots and top predator weapons, which compete with humans in labor and war fields, accelerating life extinction, as Earth becomes terraformed. So human i+1 social organizations (Governments) and Wor(l)d languages become replaced by company-mothers and its memetic, digital language, e-money, which ‘cre(dit)ates’ from its global i+1 brain, World-stock, biological radiations of i-machines, designing a III Earth to its likeness, where obsolete humans with no credit ‘exit mundi’, Greek style. Meanwhile informative machines’ networks manufacture brains with 3 symbiotic idol-ogies whose goal is to multiply 3 topologic metal-memes: capitalism (∆ informative metal-money), nationalism (∆ energetic weapons) and mechanism (∆organic machines). Thus only a politic r=evolution that aborts the Mechanocene, extinguishing its lethal Goods, M(g); controlling world-stock with legal Wor(l)ds to cre(dit)ate instead Human-Welfare Goods, H(g), can save the World, ‘Generating’ the Existential Equation or Constitution of History’s 10Di superorganism that maximizes Humanity in its 3 scales: Max.H(g) x Min. M(g).
Category: General Science and Philosophy